IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

The Communist Party

Socialist Challenge No. 104, 12 July 1979 · p. 6 of the scan · 463 words

The scan: sc-n104-jul-12-1979.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 6 of the scan

but other members of the places them at factions: commission contains sharing similar comrades meet and discuss party is during the others of comrades and party discuss common experiences, political positions.' The right of tendency and Communist parties has been denied for more than fifty years. The alternative proposals do not present a clear idea of tendencies, and reject the notion of factions. But they do show that some CP members at least are beginning to re-examine the norms of democratic centralism of the pre-Stalinist period.

Although opposing factions, report unwittingly provides a definition of the King St. gerontocracy in its 'Generally speaking described as a group which has drawn up a platform and campaigns for it through oné or more of the following forms: conferences, journals, circulation of documents and making contact across the normal structures of the party:

"Debate and argument which are self-appointed bodies answerable only to themselves, is not a democratic way of deciding policy. A group of individuals with sufficient financial and other publish a journal and pay fares for comrades to attend meetings would enjoy an advantage over whose views might to the party and members.' But what about the political con for it in draws up a platform, and democracy meetings, interests and self-appointed faction in membership. enjoys an tendency membership opposing the the description of party faction can be problems between Marxists. pamphlets, the The maintained nonsense. between factions, fullest among resources methods. of greater interest to campaigns for it conferences, journals, etc. and, since 1954 at faction ensures is able to discuss positions in their clearest form. Apologists for the King St. regime argue that any political line leadership must 'alien Marxism', or 'liberalism', or 'petit-bourgeois'.

This is a Stalinist notion; the monolithic infallible leadership leader?). What is Marxism, unless it is a living problems ping enored it is peretly phenomena? It natural to expect that there can be difference.

idea that Marxist 'purity' can be by administrative The only consistently defending Marxist positions is the education, discussion, and members. The hundreds thousands of Polish workers who flocked to see testimony to the bankruptcy of bureaucratic the Pope on his recent VISI are a tragi Reading through the dry text of the 60-page repört, it becomes clear that the Communist Party leadership has no conception of the need to develop a politically conscious membership who can become leaders in their workplaces, extreme consequences parties are in power It is least, Jeopardise different (and the Engie tring union pertectly these officials!

debate of decline in both party 'Report

----- pull-quotes -----

12 Jely 1979 Page 6 party organisations and to hold meetings to

answerable only to itself. And it certainly advantage over the rest of the In a revolutionary organisation the right of

← IS LENINISM As the British Communist Party debates the ! of socialist feminists challenge the very basisOBSOLETE? orms of inner-party functioning, a group f Leninism. We review both developments. →

Something wrong on this page?