IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

Vote LABOUR

Socialist Challenge No. 12, 8 September 1977 · p. 15 of the scan · 145 words

The scan: sc-n12-sep-8-1977.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-1 of 4; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 15 of the scan

ments are made that ane genuinely believed to be instinctive but are of course the products of the training and social grooming that the mind has under. gone. Decisions are made by executives very mindfal of job security about scripts writlen by authors who The taste consensus Jades cannot or will not touch. osmotically downwards through the TV chain of conmand. Every producer "knows' what's expected expected.

Personally 1 have never seen or read or imagined anuthine that Ido not think could be shown on television. Experience has taught me to trust the authar not the cesor. So ofen it rurns out that it was the censor who misjudged the degree of public offence, not the artist 3. Self-censorship Overt censarship can be opposed overtly but ensorship can subvert the writer looking for success to paper, This can and does work subconsolously on

← Censorship in TV dramaX BRAND →

Something wrong on this page?