IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

Against new draft

Socialist Challenge No. 2, 16 June 1977 · p. 7 of the scan · 177 words

The scan: sc-n02-jun-16-1977.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-2 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 7 of the scan

Surrey the new draft of Road Committeemember who supports the leadership indicates that the CPleadership.

CONGRESS DECISION Higgs pointed to these concerns in his contribution rebognised by the chairperson, Hauld French be bound by the decision of the Congress in the even ther it accepted the draft druwn up by the leadership? In his refusal to indicate the outcome of such a situation the CP could well be put on the people Thursday night Mr. Sid French.

district secretary of the Communist Party, spoke against *The British to Socialism." A collection of over E400 was made.

positionsadvanced by French French hammered away at the fundamental policies be feels the EC has trampled on in the current draft. Heputthe need to retain the struggle for the dictatorsbip of the groletariat at the forefront of his This concep was evident when hallenged by a member of th the need of the working class to impose its will on society dictatorship of the proletariat with nothing other than bureaucracy in the Sovier Union

----- pull-quotes -----

attended by

← The meeting in Merton Town Hall was a perilous affair. It reveals The CP nearing a splitSWP approaches CP for joint work →

Something wrong on this page?