Whilet hich surpases most made n and hat an rotte a tasis epicaph Rosi politically confused and one car criticise the film hoth drama tically and politically - the far lelt for example CSCC It the film as playboys or tools of the ultra-right IHOPE that John Boran road Jane Clarke's Comment' In Sociallat Challenge (30 June) on the pegt This lettar in which he ceo'e Private Vices, Pubilc Vir HRS WAS SISEEELICUA VOrOILT SCRAURS SAE HE IHHAL SIONE that there'e no paint in merely throwing Insults at sach othe There are serious discusaion here. And surely the racy. 1 nereiore 8i80 поро sh Fone will be put off the Jansce film by allitude becausé his latter Ian't accurate For SCEUTSIHY. -TRIA ATilm 0 00. TrO' women naked tinst, men The first naked body we see ia that of the Prince. privata marte included, and that in ver denisorie Decisay esusR dan cao wishes to challenge con The trouble, judging from the Is that he Is apparently unable 1o this kind of chal onga, unable toa , to respond to Bot Which he im sog e Am D wIsco e Fm Cao n Tra nR is SotuaY 1a NENICH the even o1. many bourgaois critice who at least recognise that such films cannot be taken siterglly.
TIET DEIE ONOr avoid the impilcalions.
Aeathatic production WOrK.
many recognise this not anly leads tf barren criticism. It also leada te SENS CLICURa DOHCdd MICHAEL CHANAN (London)