IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

Why Ford changed its

Socialist Challenge No. 67, 12 October 1978 · p. 4 of the scan · 191 words

The scan: sc-n67-oct-12-1978.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-2 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 4 of the scan

DESPITE speed up, attacks on discipline and productivity of the British Ford workers has not increased at the rate of Ford workers in other The Select Committee report on the British motor industry published in 9lo identinea lack of investment as the chief producuvity believed that investment substantially reases the capital productivity the British motor industry will not be able to equal productivity abroad.' A report produced by the Government's "Think-Tank', the Central Policy Staff, looked to other causes of low productivity particular, work practices and discipline.

Moreover, the report concluded that if the industry is to viable there Socialist Challenge 12October 1978 Page4 the industry'.

Taken together, these reports give real insight into what Ford management productivity deal. *A deal based on national targets with local targets to be worked out accordingly. Local line speeds determined on this basis with less rank-and-file 'until CORIOL *Introduction of new techstock, nology, including Bridgend plant being built in South Wales, introduction OE cessing, especially on the staff side. *A major assault absenteeism, action, and union prerogatives; tightening of discipline.

The result: harder greater health hazards, weaker union organisation and no loss.

← PRODUCTIVITY NO TA DEALS FUNEXPOSURE →

Something wrong on this page?