press forward to the removal of the contradichon abolition of their quality as capital, to the practical recognition of their productive Sharp's And there you have it: what is capitalism is not socialism eventually but class struggle now. Both Marx and Engels had no word of advice from Engels for all readers: "To make a science of Socialism, it had first to be politics with Tony on Marxism (2 think that by is an outgrowth, Sharp arrives at an since when view great historical 1914-18 Wal problems in the history of ideas? Yet Sharp tells u •determinism' was The German SPD's capitulation to social chauvinism was a product of reversible material processes at work in German society at the time, not Engels wrote in Anti-During (1878). In fact Engels those (Duhring, BRITISH IMPERJA WHILE leaving it up to readers to decide for nemselves abour lony complete misreading November or my cuers ocoDer. I'd still like to deal with some entirely new points which he raises.
According to Sharp Lenin was a social Darwinist and belonged to a 'materialist lineage which included Kautsky, Bernstein and Stalin. If this was so why, for instance, did Lenin spend several pamphlets exposing the links between Kautsky's reformist and vulgar materialism/ economic determinism?
Sharp doesn't bother with this question, probably because considers it too theoretical diversionary. He has all the answers anyway — or at least the solution. It's cased revolomary practice doing it 'now'. Maybe Jerry Rubin will MCIDOUL However, a necessary part revolutony practice is knowing how capitalism objectively works. It is useless talking about the revolutionary subject if no account is taken of the objective processes of history. Such an account can never be absolutely "correct" but it is nevertheless an essential in the theoretical armoury of any revolutionary organisation.
Sharp dismisses any lessons which might be learnt from the practical use to when scientinic socialsin nas been put in the past by revolutionary as he is concerned, history can never be discussed with any objecavity and amounts to no more than an indistinct mistake. Thus he and ask, you run the risk of being put down in sucn a patronising way ina you are made to feel a fool for not naving caucaica Couldn't Socialist Challenge also explain positions far more fully, rather (2 than expecting natural agreement and understanding among its readership? Perhaps I could now describemyself as a revolutionary socialist. But i feel this is more perseverance. How many supporters have you lost along the way? You are seriously lacking in your capacity to educate and therefore build.
IGREENBAUM (Manchester]
*We will be starting a regular series of one-page educational articles later this month.
and of GEOFFREY Sheridan, in criticising Wedge (26 October), sees the world parcelled up into neat little package of politics. one should be content to work away at their own little patch and not interfere in what he sees as exclusively the arena of 'politics.
Socialist Challenge, along with the rest of the left press, illustrates this approach ghettoising "culture' page of the paper and also by its narrow concept of what "culture" is. Michael Stewart's letter to Wedge 3 (which the collective TAKE ONE TOTALLY FICTIONAL GROUP IN THE I.R.A A COUPLE OF STORIES MORONIC AND/OR JOURNALISTS such allegations Markov evidence to due to my own that Bulgaria...
Bulgaria the real culture, etc., where everydiscretion. both normally be to a separate will recommends SA'S _WHICH CAN BE ATTRIBUTEI 7 AN INTERNA FEUD!!
IFE • LEAVES KOODS TAIN ON BRITISH been forthcoming to For the innuendo contained in your first paragraph on The article gives not a shred of support the statement about *the thousands in Bulgaria's political prisons, relying instead on an Amnesty report which can hardly even guess at the internal repression' etc., and a pamphlet which suggests etc. 'Guesses' and "suggestions' are hardly the currency of serious people committed to the building of socialism, whether here or in Eastern European countries like While it would be foolish to deny problems which exist, especially given the backward historical developments until recently in many of these countries, I feel your readers will gain little insight into the nature of such problems through such irresponsible articles written by those whose aims seem closely alled with the apologists in the capitalist press N.M. LEES (London SW19)
* * * THE LENGTH of letters printed will usually be kept down to 400 words in order to encourage as wide s range of contributions possible. All cut at the Editor's Unsigned letters will not published, although we withhold real Manes pubicanon on request AND NOW YOU'RE READY FO ASSASSINATIONS REPUBLICAN
----- pull-quotes -----
separating humanity as a social being from the natural universe of which it
Understanding culture