IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

Loss of literary supplement

Socialist Challenge No. 75, 7 December 1978 · pp. 3-4 of the scan · 206 words

The scan: sc-n75-dec-7-1978.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-3 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 3 of the scan

From Francis Mulhern, an editor of 'New Left Review' On the face of it, the Times Literary Supplement is a review of serious books. But if you compare it with a formally similar publication, such as the York Times Review of Books, you SCOl CIES character.

It'san academic trade paper, composed in the image those who write and read it.

Traditionally the TLS has combined pure academicism with frivolity. IC DOORS Land only slightly disturbing reviewed are like so many Himalavan peaks -simply because they're there, and read in the same spirit.

The supplement's policy of having all its articles unsigned provided light relief for readers. In academic real Friday was guessing game day whos ne Dastare whe knifed my book?"

of Under its present editor, John Gross, certain changes have occurred. poncy anonymity has been dropped, attractively designed climbed It has also become politically harder, shifting to theright.

Marxists former known on its pages, and recent booksby British Marxist writers nave been subjected to very every deliberate hatchet jobs. Chrisroom, topher Hill and Terry Eagleton arethe loses on the The loss disturb more than its contents ever did. It has always been so dull and conformist that disturbed anyone.

page 4 of the scan

for have

← Unions lack strategy in press shutdownCanadian press strike →

Something wrong on this page?